new research shows how parents can use coercive control on their children
- Written by Kate Fitz-Gibbon, Professor (Practice), Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University
In Australia, there is growing recognition[1] that children and young people are not just witnesses to domestic, family and sexual violence, but victim-survivors in their own right.
While we are getting better at understanding how coercive control operates in adult relationships – particularly where men use it against women – much less attention has been given to how children experience this kind of abuse, especially when it comes from a parent or caregiver.
New research[2] interviewing teenage victim-survivors reveals how parents can coercively control their children under the guise of parental discipline.
What is coercive control?
Coercive control is a pattern of abusive behaviours used to instil fear, dominate or isolate someone over time. It can include:
physical violence
sexual abuse
surveillance
threats
humiliation
limiting access to money
technology-facilitated abuse
animal abuse, among many other abusive tactics.
Focusing largely on adult victim-survivors, research has found[3] experiences of coercive control can have cumulative and long-lasting negative impacts.
Studies[4] of children show how coercive control can erode a child’s mental health, self-esteem and sense of safety.
Fear, guilt and manipulation
For young people, within the context of the family, coercive control may be perpetrated by parents, step-parents, caregivers, siblings and other family members. The tactics used may mirror those seen in adult contexts.
But there are different circumstances at play for children. They are typically dependent on their caregivers, still mentally developing, and often have limited access to external support.
My new report, Silence and Inaction[5], released by the South Australian Royal Commission into Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence[6], draws on interviews with 53 young people aged 13–18 who have experienced different forms of domestic, family and sexual violence in that state.
In this study[7], young victim-survivors spoke of rules imposed by abusive adults in their family to control their friendships, communication, bodily autonomy and emotional expression. These were often enforced through fear, guilt or manipulation. One child told me:
I kicked the wall when I was eight, and my parents came in and they stripped my entire room bare, just got rid of everything […] I was either in my room or was at school […] I got water brought to me, food brought to me three times a day […] they said, “You have abused this home. It was a loving place, and you’ve abused it so when people do things wrong, they go to prison”. I was very fearful of my parents.
Several young people described experiences that reflect the dynamics of coercive control, even if they did not use that language themselves. They spoke of environments where control, surveillance and isolation were constant, and where resistance or independence was met with punishment.
Experiences of gaslighting
Several young victim-survivors interviewed described being made to feel “crazy” or “overdramatic” when they challenged the behaviour they were experiencing. Others were punished for asserting boundaries or seeking help.
A number of young people described experiences of gaslighting[8] – being told their memories or feelings were wrong or exaggerated.
Read more: Explainer: what does 'gaslighting' mean?[9]
This was particularly apparent among young people who had tried to speak up about the violence they were experiencing. One young victim-survivor told me:
I was very much gaslighting myself, and then also was being gaslit for years prior by my father and not made to feel that I could ever tell anyone.
Some young victim-survivors described beginning to question their own perceptions or feeling responsible for the harm they experienced. One young person said:
I always have a fear in my head that everything I’ve said and done [is] just a massive lie, which is why I documented a lot of things […] I have photos and videos of things that have happened […] it kind of keeps me a little bit sane.
For the young people interviewed, the dynamics of coercive control were further compounded by their legal and financial dependence on the person using violence.
Young people described having limited avenues to escape or resist the abuse, and having little access to alternative sources of care or trusted adults for support.
Discipline or control?
Many of the young people I interviewed[10] said the abuse they experienced was explained away by parents as “discipline”.
Reasonable parenting involves setting boundaries and enforcing rules through clear communication and respect for a child’s emotional and physical safety. What the young people in the study described went well beyond that.
The young people interviewed described being physically punished – through beatings, slaps or threats – as a way of “correcting” behaviour or “teaching respect”.
For young people, this led to confusion and self-doubt about whether what they experienced “counted” as abuse.
This mislabelling of abuse as discipline was particularly difficult for young people to challenge when it was reinforced by religious, cultural or generational norms. In some cases, violence was deeply embedded in family tradition and viewed as an expected method of parenting.
Young people interviewed expressed a strong desire for this cycle to be broken, including through education for caregivers. One young victim said:
it’s not just kids who need to learn – adults need to unlearn the stuff they were taught too.
The need for change
Several young people believed some parents may be unaware of the impacts of these forms of punishment. They called for targeted awareness campaigns and community education. One young victim-survivor suggested:
they feel that is still part of discipline, whereas they are actually going extra miles […] I think parents too need to be educated on how they treat their children.
Several young people said their experiences of abuse were often minimised or dismissed as necessary or appropriate acts of discipline by extended family, caregivers or other adults in their community.
This highlights the need to better engage families and communities to change understandings of discipline, particularly through culturally responsive, trauma-informed approaches to education.
We must develop deeper understandings of coercive and controlling behaviours as they are experienced by children and young people in families.
Without such awareness, there is a risk that controlling behaviour will continue to be minimised as “strict parenting”, or young people’s disclosures will be dismissed.
These experiences highlight the problem of the normalisation of violence in some households and the need for greater prevention and early intervention efforts, both for young people and caregivers.
References
- ^ there is growing recognition (theconversation.com)
- ^ New research (figshare.com)
- ^ research has found (aifs.gov.au)
- ^ Studies (academic.oup.com)
- ^ Silence and Inaction (figshare.com)
- ^ South Australian Royal Commission into Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence (www.royalcommissiondfsv.sa.gov.au)
- ^ In this study (figshare.com)
- ^ gaslighting (theconversation.com)
- ^ Explainer: what does 'gaslighting' mean? (theconversation.com)
- ^ I interviewed (figshare.com)
